look at the Channel level when the bpm goes up from 128 to 130 when the MT is on and then when is off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-nfGgwIpwc&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-nfGgwIpwc&feature=youtu.be
Inviato Sat 30 Aug 14 @ 5:20 pm
Video is private, but I think I know what you mean.
Inviato Sat 30 Aug 14 @ 6:19 pm
DJ SWID wrote :
look at the Channel level when the bpm goes up from 128 to 130 when the MT is on and then when is off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-nfGgwIpwc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-nfGgwIpwc
now it workes...
Inviato Sat 30 Aug 14 @ 6:22 pm
Yup we've discussed said issue in the regression threads and part of it is the physics of changing pitch (or key) increasing volume, but it does seem a bit much for less than +2% pitch, especially since 'the machine could deal with this technicality'* (Quote Atomix 'Why choose VDJ) so that some sort of AGC could normalize gain for any pitch or key change.
Staff input required.
Staff input required.
Inviato Sat 30 Aug 14 @ 7:10 pm
In ver. 7 with MT on +-10bpm and no volume change, its a bug or something in the 8.
Inviato Sat 30 Aug 14 @ 8:21 pm
Any reference from the dev team ?
Inviato Sun 31 Aug 14 @ 8:14 am
for sure is an issue in the engine and the GUI.
Inviato Mon 01 Sep 14 @ 2:56 am
Until now, no suggestions...
Inviato Mon 01 Sep 14 @ 11:42 am
did some testing if you set
zerodb 0.75
pitchQuality 0
autogain Auto
these settings will at least avoid clipping till there is a real fix
pitchQuality 0 is the right setting when using master tempo the gain is very minimal on my system with it set this way
zerodb 0.75
pitchQuality 0
autogain Auto
these settings will at least avoid clipping till there is a real fix
pitchQuality 0 is the right setting when using master tempo the gain is very minimal on my system with it set this way
Inviato Mon 01 Sep 14 @ 2:41 pm
im going back to 7 until this problem fixed...
Inviato Mon 01 Sep 14 @ 4:36 pm
pitchQuality should be set to 1 or 2, which were you using in the video?
Do you also see the volume changing when just moving the pitch fader, or is it only a problem when using the sync button?
Also, what is your autogain setting.
I tried, but I cannot reproduce this with pitchQuality 1 or 2.
Do you also see the volume changing when just moving the pitch fader, or is it only a problem when using the sync button?
Also, what is your autogain setting.
I tried, but I cannot reproduce this with pitchQuality 1 or 2.
Inviato Tue 02 Sep 14 @ 5:49 am
pitchQuality on 2
auto+remember
the volume changing even when i just move the pitch fader a little bit up or down, the sync was for the video...
win 7, samsung i7 8gb, 2gb amd video card
auto+remember
the volume changing even when i just move the pitch fader a little bit up or down, the sync was for the video...
win 7, samsung i7 8gb, 2gb amd video card
Inviato Tue 02 Sep 14 @ 9:08 am
Tested now
b1948
Pitch quality 2
Auto gain(remember) 0.0dB
Master tempo on
128 bpm Track at quartz lock in a 1/2 beat loop on a loud part of the track
get level reads a constant 65%
Increase pitch by 0.1%
get level reads upto 80% (varying)
Increase to +2%
get level reads over 90% (varying)
b1948
Pitch quality 2
Auto gain(remember) 0.0dB
Master tempo on
128 bpm Track at quartz lock in a 1/2 beat loop on a loud part of the track
get level reads a constant 65%
Increase pitch by 0.1%
get level reads upto 80% (varying)
Increase to +2%
get level reads over 90% (varying)
Inviato Tue 02 Sep 14 @ 9:31 am
That means you approve my words...
Inviato Tue 02 Sep 14 @ 10:13 am
is there going to be a fix for this bug ?
Inviato Thu 04 Sep 14 @ 9:32 pm
Inviato Sun 07 Sep 14 @ 4:14 am
With the track in your video I can indeed also see the vu meter peaking higher, however it doesn't sound louder overall, so I don't think there's a real problem here.
It's just a side effect of the mastertempo algorithm that it can create short fragments that have a higher peak than the original, probably due to phase shifts.
It's just a side effect of the mastertempo algorithm that it can create short fragments that have a higher peak than the original, probably due to phase shifts.
Inviato Tue 09 Sep 14 @ 11:35 am
You can see that the master vol is also going to the reds when the bpm is up or down what about that ??
Inviato Tue 09 Sep 14 @ 11:09 pm
I think what Adion was saying is that this increase in volume is so quick/short that although you can see a difference (the software is so quick it can detect a difference)
you can't hear a difference (which is the important bit) they could paper over this imperfection, (a less sensitive VU) but they don't need to change any thing about how pitch changes tracks.
You could prove it yourself by recording a track at a non quartz locked pitch and analysing and you'll find the difference in average output dBs negligible.
But you were right to bring it up, it looks like a problem, it's just that how it looks and how it sounds aren't related on this one.
Key change and volume change however could do with tweaking, but that's already in the wishes thread.
you can't hear a difference (which is the important bit) they could paper over this imperfection, (a less sensitive VU) but they don't need to change any thing about how pitch changes tracks.
You could prove it yourself by recording a track at a non quartz locked pitch and analysing and you'll find the difference in average output dBs negligible.
But you were right to bring it up, it looks like a problem, it's just that how it looks and how it sounds aren't related on this one.
Key change and volume change however could do with tweaking, but that's already in the wishes thread.
Inviato Wed 10 Sep 14 @ 10:58 am
locodog Are you with me or against me ? There is a obvious problem with the master tempo, i work with VDJ 7 for 8 years Three nights a week and I have not seen anything like that.
And if there is reds in the master then it is clear that the volume up...
And if there is reds in the master then it is clear that the volume up...
Inviato Wed 10 Sep 14 @ 2:59 pm