Accesso rapido:  

Forum: VirtualDJ Technical Support

Topic: "Randomly" messed up audio settings
Hi!

I've got this "problem" since the very first day I'm using VDJ, and I was since searching for a solutions every once in a while, but couldn't find any.

So my question here is:
How come that my SAVED audio settings (the ones in the right bottom corner of the config window) or even the last setting I configured, get messed up almost every time by connected hardware. (Even kinda unpredictable somehow)

I also tried turning off "audioAutoDetect", but this didn't seem to make any difference.

My basic understanding of a SAVED audio configuration is that it remains just the way I saved it, but sometimes it gets overwritten by connected hardware, some other time it chooses the CDJs even though the DJM-Mixer I presaved and chose before is already connected.

Why is it this way and what can I do to have it more reliable?

- Thanks in advance for your help!
 

Inviato Sat 18 Nov 23 @ 6:20 pm
I'm having the same issue and would love a solution.
 

I've also wondered why the software never goes back to the default audio config (config1) by default, but there is a workaround - add this to your ONINIT for your keyboard mapping:

apply_audio_config "config 1"

Replace config 1 with whatever name you have for your default audio configuration. Prepend a & if you already have content in your ONINIT.

This seems to work well, even if you connect controllers, as it seems the keyboard mapping is processed first.
 

DJ VinylTouch wrote :
I've also wondered why the software never goes back to the default audio config (config1) by default, but there is a workaround - add this to your ONINIT for your keyboard mapping:

apply_audio_config "config 1"

Replace config 1 with whatever name you have for your default audio configuration. Prepend a & if you already have content in your ONINIT.

This seems to work well, even if you connect controllers, as it seems the keyboard mapping is processed first.

Hmmm okkk, sound like a really good workaround...
I was wondering what the behavior would be with a controller, but you answered that question according to my hopes, that's why it sounds really like a good solution.

But still i would love to see that done kinda "officially" since it is just the most convinient and intuitive way.

But thank you, i will use it!